Not courage. Company.
Nine thousand verses, and near the end he spends nine of them on a wish. Look at what he asks for — because it is not protection, and it is not fearlessness.
जें खळांची व्यंकटी सांडो । तया सत्कर्मीं रती वाढो ।
भूतां परस्परें पडो । मैत्र जीवाचें ॥
bhūtāṁ paraspareṁ paḍo, maitra jīvāche
"Let the crookedness of the crooked fall away, and their delight in good work grow instead. And let all beings be bound to one another — in the friendship of soul."
The Pasāyadān is the closing prayer of the Dnyāneshwarī — nine ovīs near the end of chapter 18, numbered 1794–1802 in the standard printings; the chapter runs on to 18.1811, where the book names Nevase and signs off with its date. It is the most-recited passage in all of Marathi literature, still spoken at school assemblies across Maharashtra. The ovī quoted here is the second of the nine (18.1795).
Old Marathi orthography varies between editions — you will see पडो and जडो in the third line, and व्यंकटी spelled several ways. We follow the reading most widely printed. Text pending a final check against a named critical edition (Sākhare / Government of Maharashtra).
चंद्रमे जे अलांछन । मार्तंड जे तापहीन । ते सर्वांही सदा सज्जन । सोयरे होतु ॥ — "Moons with no blemish on them. Suns that do not burn. May the good be kin to everyone, always."
A frightened person does not need brilliance. They need a light that will not scorch them. If you are choosing who to call tonight, this is the specification: a sun with the heat taken out of it.
दुरितांचें तिमिर जावो । विश्व स्वधर्मसूर्यें पाहो । जो जें वांच्छिल तो तें लाहो । प्राणिजात ॥ — "Let the darkness of harm lift. Let the world see the sun of its own true work. And let every living thing get what it longs for."
He never asks for fear to be removed from anyone. He asks for light, for honest work, and for each creature to get what it wants. Fear here is treated as darkness — not fought, just outlasted by morning.
देवाचिये द्वारीं उभा क्षणभरी । तेणें मुक्ति चारी साधियेल्या ॥ हरि मुखें म्हणा हरि मुखें म्हणा । पुण्याची गणना कोण करी ॥ — "Stand at God's door for even a moment, and the four liberations are won. Say Hari with your mouth, say Hari — who is counting merit?"
Not enter. Not finish. Stand at the door a moment, and say the name. In his tradition that is counted as the whole thing — and nobody is keeping score.
Most of the names in this collection reached you through a translator. Dnyaneshwar was one — and that is precisely his teaching about fear. Fear does not argue with you in Sanskrit, or in English. It speaks to you in your mother tongue, at two in the morning, using your own voice. His radical act, as a teenager, was to drag the consolation into the same language the fear was already using.
And then look at how he ends his closing prayer. A boy who, in the tradition's telling, was declared illegitimate from birth, mocked by the learned, and whose parents gave up their lives for his sake — he ends it not by asking for protection, and not by declaring himself unafraid, but by asking that everyone else be all right. भूतां परस्परें पडो मैत्र जीवाचें. That is the medicine, stated plainly in some of the oldest literary Marathi we have: not courage. Company.
He did not pray to be unafraid. He prayed that no one be alone in it.
Angry at the bend, not the man
The same ovī, read from the other end. Anger's favourite argument is but I am right — and Dnyaneshwar was right. What he does with being right is the teaching.
जें खळांची व्यंकटी सांडो । तया सत्कर्मीं रती वाढो ।
भूतां परस्परें पडो । मैत्र जीवाचें ॥
bhūtāṁ paraspareṁ paḍo, maitra jīvāche
"Let the crookedness of the crooked fall away — and let their delight in good work grow in its place. And let all beings be bound to one another in the friendship of soul."
The Pasāyadān is the closing prayer of the Dnyāneshwarī — nine ovīs near the end of chapter 18, numbered 1794–1802 in the standard printings; the chapter runs on to 18.1811, where the book names Nevase and signs off with its date. It is the most-recited passage in all of Marathi literature, still spoken at school assemblies across Maharashtra. The ovī quoted here is the second of the nine (18.1795).
खळ (khaḷ) means the crooked, the wicked, the ones who do harm. व्यंकटी (vyaṅkaṭī) is the bentness or crookedness itself — a property, not a person. The distinction is the whole teaching, and it is why this verse belongs on a page about anger.
Old Marathi orthography varies between editions — you will see पडो and जडो in the third line. We follow the reading most widely printed. Text pending a final check against a named critical edition (Sākhare / Government of Maharashtra).
चंद्रमे जे अलांछन । मार्तंड जे तापहीन ॥ — "Moons with no blemish on them. Suns that do not burn."
तापहीन — heat-less. Anger is heat; that is not a metaphor, it is what your body is doing right now. He is not asking for the light to be dimmed. He is asking for light that does not scald the person standing in it — how to be right about something without setting someone on fire.
आतां विश्वात्मकें देवें । येणें वाग्यज्ञें तोषावें । तोषोनि मज द्यावें । पसायदान हें ॥ — "Now may the God who is the soul of all be pleased with this sacrifice made of speech — and being pleased, grant me this grace."
वाग्यज्ञ — a yajña of speech. He does not call his book a book. He calls it a fire he fed with words. One way to read it: a person carrying what the tradition says he carried had to put it somewhere; he put it into language, on purpose, for eighteen chapters.
जो जें वांच्छिल तो तें लाहो । प्राणिजात ॥ — "And let every living thing get what it longs for."
Read it slowly, because it is the hard one. Every living thing — not the deserving ones. He is asking that the people who wronged him also get what they long for. You do not have to be able to do this tonight. It is useful only to know that someone with a better case than yours thought it was the direction to face.
There is no telling of his life in which Dnyaneshwar was not wronged, and he had the platform to say so — nine thousand verses, some of the most beautiful Marathi yet written, and an audience. Near the end he spends nine ovīs asking that the crooked be relieved of their crookedness.
But look closely, because this is not "letting it go" and it is not the soft kind of forgiveness. He does not say the खळ were fine. He names them — crooked — flatly, in the first two syllables. What he asks to be removed is the व्यंकटी: the bend itself, as a thing separate from the person carrying it. One way to read it: he is angry at the bend and not at the man. That is a much more precise operation than either forgiving or condemning, and it is genuinely available to you in an argument tonight: find the bent thing, aim there, leave the person standing.
He named the crookedness. Then he prayed it out of them.
Both halves are the teaching.
The word for going home
He needed a Marathi word for the place you go when you cannot keep performing. He chose the one a married woman uses for her parents' house.
अवघाचि संसार सुखाचा करीन । आनंदें भरीन तिन्ही लोक ॥१॥
जाईन गे माये तया पंढरपुरा । भेटेन माहेरा आपुलिया ॥२॥
सर्व सुकृतांचें फळ मी लाहीन । क्षेम मी देईन पांडुरंगीं ॥३॥
बाप रखुमादेवीवरु विठ्ठलेंसीं भेटी । आपुलें संवसाटी करुनी ठेला ॥४॥
jāīn ge māye tayā paṇḍharpurā, bheṭen māherā āpuliyā
sarva sukṛtāṁcheṁ phaḷ mī lāhīn, kṣem mī deīn pāṇḍuraṅgī
bāp rakhumādevīvaru viṭṭhaleṁsī bheṭī, āpuleṁ saṁvsāṭī karunī ṭhelā
"I will make this whole life one of happiness; I will fill all three worlds with joy. I am going, mother, to that Pandharpur — I am going to meet my māher. I will receive the fruit of every good thing I have done; I will give Panduranga an embrace. The last line is difficult; one reading is: Rakhumadevi's lord Vitthal came out to meet me, and stood there having made the exchange his own."
An honest distinction first. The Dnyāneshwarī — his commentary on the Gita — is a fixed, stable text with settled chapter-and-ovī numbering. The abhang corpus attributed to Dnyaneshwar is a looser body, carried by Warkari singing, and it varies more. This abhang is widely printed and widely sung, and it carries his colophon, बाप रखुमादेवीवरु — "Rakhumadevi's lord" — the signature line by which his abhangas are traditionally identified. Cited by opening line, not number; spellings vary (अवघाचि / अवघाचि हा, संवसाटी / सवसाटी). Text pending a final check against a named critical edition.
माहेर · māher is not translatable in one word. It is a married woman's parents' home — the place she goes back to when she is worn thin, where she is fed without being asked to earn it and does not have to hold anything together. Marathi has a whole genre of songs about longing for it.
वर्षत सकळमंगळीं । ईश्वरनिष्ठांची मांदियाळी । अनवरत भूमंडळीं । भेटतु भूतां ॥ — "Let the whole company of those settled in God — raining down every blessing as they go — keep meeting the creatures of this earth, without a break."
The verb he chose is bheṭatu — let them keep meeting beings. Not instructing, not saving, not lifting. Meeting. When a boy of about fifteen was granted one wish for the whole world, he asked that good people keep running into everybody else, continually, forever.
येथ म्हणे श्रीविश्वेशरावो । हा होईल दानपसावो । येणें वरें ज्ञानदेवो । सुखिया जाला ॥ — "Then the Lord of the Universe said: this gift is granted. And with that boon, Dnyanadev became content."
The last ovī of the closing prayer — a few lines before the book signs off with its date — and what he was content about is the point. He receives nothing for himself — the boon was that the crooked soften, that the good keep meeting people, that every creature get what it longs for. He becomes sukhiyā at the news that everyone else will be all right. If the only thing that has ever reliably lifted your own evening is doing something for somebody else, this is one of the oldest notes on that in Marathi.
मोगरा फुलला मोगरा फुलला । फुलें वेंचितां बहरु कळियांसी आला ॥ — "The jasmine has bloomed, the jasmine has bloomed. Even as I gathered the flowers, the buds came into bloom."
One of the most-sung lines in Marathi — and the blooming happens while he is still gathering, faster than he can collect it. In his own frame it is devotion flowering in him. On evenings when nothing seems to move, it is at least a record that things have bloomed before, without being made to.
Sorrow, like fear, does not address you in Sanskrit. It speaks in your mother tongue, in your own voice, using your own material — and Dnyaneshwar's act at about fifteen was to drag the consolation into the same language the sorrow was already using. Anyone who has tried to talk themselves down in a borrowed language knows how large a thing that is.
Then look at the word he reaches for when he describes going to God. Not a fortress, not a throne, not a court. Māher. The word a Marathi woman uses for her parents' house — the one place where she is not being assessed, where nobody needs anything from her, where she can arrive worn out and be fed. A thirteenth-century man borrows a married woman's word for the place you go when you cannot keep performing. Of all the things sadness actually wants at eleven at night, that is closest to it: not to be cheered up, and not to be fixed. To go somewhere where nothing is asked.
He did not ask to stop feeling it.
He asked to go somewhere nothing is required of him.
The one who talked to a crow
One of the oldest Marathi genres for loneliness is a woman alone in a house, waiting. He wrote in it — and the tradition's best-known story about him is the day he shut himself behind a door, and his younger sister sang to him through it.
पैल तो गे काऊ कोकताहे । शकून गे माये सांगतसे ॥१॥
उडरे उडरे काऊ तुझे सोन्यानें मढीन पाऊ । पाहुणे पंढरीराऊ घरा कैं येती ॥२॥
दहिंभाताचीं उंडी लाविन तुझ्या तोंडी । जीवा पढिये त्याची गोडी सांग वेगीं ॥३॥
दुधें भरुनी वाटी लावीन तुझे वोंठी । सत्य सांगे गोठी विठो येईल कायी ॥४॥
आंबयां डाहाळीं फळें चुंबी रसाळीं । आजिचेरे काळीं शकून सांगे ॥५॥
ज्ञानदेव म्हणे जाणिजे ये खुणें । भेटती पंढरीराणे शकून सांगे ॥६॥
uḍa re uḍa re kāū tujhe sonyāneṁ maḍhīn pāū, pāhuṇe paṇḍharīrāū gharā kaiṁ yetī
dahiṁbhātāchīṁ uṇḍī lāvin tujhyā toṇḍī, jīvā paḍhiye tyāchī goḍī sāṅg vegīṁ
dudheṁ bharunī vāṭī lāvīn tujhe voṇṭhī, satya sāṅge goṭhī viṭho yeīl kāyī
āṁbayāṁ ḍāhāḷīṁ phaḷeṁ chumbī rasāḷīṁ, ājiche re kāḷīṁ śakūn sāṅge
dnyāndev mhaṇe jāṇije ye khuṇeṁ, bheṭatī paṇḍharīrāṇe śakūn sāṅge
"There — over there — the crow is calling. Mother, it's telling an omen. Fly, fly, crow, and I'll cover your feet in gold — when is the guest, the King of Pandhari, coming home? I'll put a ball of curd-rice in your beak; its sweetness is dear to my very life — only tell me quickly. I'll fill a bowl with milk and hold it to your lips. Tell me the truth: will Vitho come? On the mango branch, kissing the ripe fruit — give me the omen for today. Dnyandev says: know it by this sign. The King of Pandhari will come. The omen says so."
A virahiṇī abhang — the poet speaks as a woman alone in the house, waiting for a beloved who has not come; the folk belief underneath it, still alive in villages, is that a crow cawing on the wall means a guest is on the way. The same honest distinction as always: the Dnyāneshwarī is a fixed text with settled numbering; the abhang corpus attributed to Dnyaneshwar is a looser body carried by Warkari singing, with more variation. This one is widely printed (santsahitya.in numbers it 188 in its sequence) and widely sung — the version most people know is the one Lata Mangeshkar recorded, which sings सांगताहे where the printed texts have सांगतसे.
It ends ज्ञानदेव म्हणे, not with the बाप रखुमादेविवरु colophon some of his abhangas carry — we have not added one. Couplets 1, 2, 5 and 6 are confirmed across two independent sources; the wording of couplets 3 and 4 (the curd-rice, the bowl of milk) rests on a single printed source, with the content corroborated in prose elsewhere. Other spellings seen: मढवीन / मढीन, शकुन / शकून. Cited by opening line, not number. Not yet checked against a named critical edition.
योगी पावन मनाचा । साही अपराध जनाचा ॥ विश्व रागें झालें वन्ही । संतीं सुखें व्हावें पाणी ॥ शब्दशस्त्रें झालें क्लेश । संतीं मानावा उपदेश ॥ विश्वपट ब्रह्म दोरा । ताटी उघडा ज्ञानेश्वरा ॥ — "A yogi is clean in the mind; he bears the offences of people. If the world in its anger has become fire, let the saints gladly become water. If words used as weapons have wounded — let the saints take it as teaching. The world is the cloth, Brahman the thread. Open the door, Dnyaneshwar."
The saint of this page is, in the tradition's own best-known story about him, the one who locked the door. Insulted once too often by the learned, he went inside and would not come out. What his sister sang through the tāṭī — the woven-reed door — is not come out, you're fine; it is harder and kinder than that: if they have turned to fire, be water. And then the refrain, twelve times across twelve abhangas: open the door. This is the one image in Marathi of what it looks like when someone refuses to leave your doorstep.
संत जेणें व्हावें । जग बोलणें साहावें ॥ तरीच अंगीं थोरपण । जया नाहीं अभिमान ॥ — "Whoever would be a saint must bear what the world says. Only then is there any greatness in a person — the one who has no pride left."
Why he had shut the door in the first place: jag bolaṇeṁ, what the world says. The loneliness of being talked about — the family everyone has an opinion on, the one whose situation is discussed in the building — was, in the stories, the first loneliness he knew, from the age he could understand words. His sister does not deny it. She names it, and asks him to carry it anyway.
चलां कल्पतरूंचे अरव । चेतना चिंतामणीचें गांव । बोलते जे अर्णव । पीयूषाचे ॥ चंद्रमे जे अलांछन । मार्तंड जे तापहीन । ते सर्वांही सदा सज्जन । सोयरे होतु ॥ — "Walking groves of wish-granting trees; villages of living wish-gems; oceans that speak, and speak nectar. Moons with no blemish, suns with no scorch — may such good people be, always, kin to everyone."
The whole sentence, because the two ovīs are one wish and the second half is the point. Of all the things a boy the tradition remembers as boycotted since birth could ask for the world, he asks that the good become soyare — kin. The word in Marathi is for relatives you acquire, not the ones you are born with: in-laws, the family that marriage gives you. He is not asking that everyone be happy. He is asking that nobody be without people.
In the tradition's telling, Dnyaneshwar's loneliness was not a mood; it was a social sentence. The family was put out of caste by the people who ran the village and refused the thread ceremony, and the stories have them refused even grain. He was a child prodigy who, as the stories tell it, had no one to be a child with. Of the twelve voices in this collection, he is the one who knew earliest what it is to be in a crowd that has agreed not to see you.
And what he did with it was not to write as a sage who has risen above the need for company. He wrote as a woman alone in a house, bargaining with a crow — gold for your feet, curd-rice for your beak, only tell me if he's coming. Anyone who has ever read meaning into a phone that has not rung knows exactly what the crow is for. He takes the most undignified thing loneliness makes you do and puts it in the mouth of God's own lover, so that it is holy. Not cured. Holy.
He asked that the good be kin to everyone.
He had learned early what it costs to have none.
Give sleep its honour
When he reaches the Gita's two verses on measured sleep and waking, he slows down — and says, in his own Marathi, something the Sanskrit does not quite say.
आहार तरी सेविजे । परी युक्तीचेनि मापें मविजे । क्रियाजात आचरिजे । तयाचि स्थिती ॥३४९॥
मितला बोलीं बोलिजे । मितलिया पाउलीं चालिजे । निद्रेही मानु दीजे । अवसरें एकें ॥३५०॥
जागणें जरी जाहलें । तरी होआवें तें मितलें । येतुलेनि धातुसाम्य संचलें । असेल सहजें ॥३५१॥
mitalā bolīṁ bolije, mitaliyā pāulīṁ chālije, nidrehī mānu dīje, avasareṁ ekeṁ
jāgaṇeṁ jarī jāhaleṁ, tarī hoāveṁ teṁ mitaleṁ, yetuleni dhātusāmya saṁchaleṁ, asel sahajeṁ
"Food, yes, take it — but measure it by the measure of good proportion; and let every action be carried out in the same condition. Speak in measured words; walk with measured steps. And give sleep, too, its honour — at its own hour. If waking happens, let that too be measured. By so much, the balance of the body's elements gathers itself — naturally, of its own accord."
Dnyāneshwarī, chapter 6, the ovīs that expand Gītā 6.17 — numbered 349–351 in the text at sanskritdocuments.org (the Nāgpurkar-type numbering); other printings differ by one or two in this chapter, so we cite by the Gītā verse being glossed as well as by number. The Dnyāneshwarī is a fixed, dated text (its colophon gives Śaka 1212, 1290 CE) and its wording is far more stable than the abhang corpus; the spellings above follow the printed text. Not yet checked against a named critical edition.
Two words. Mitalā — measured, in proportion — is his rendering of the Gita's yukta, and he applies it to speech as well, which the Sanskrit does not (the Gita already has measured moving about). And mānu, honour: the Gita says sleep should be measured; Dnyaneshwar says sleep should be honoured. The ovīs just before (345–348) say that the one "sold, life and all, to sleep" is not fit for yoga — and then, immediately, that the one who refuses sleep "does not even own his body; whose yoga is it then?" Both excesses are named.
भावेंवीण भक्ति भक्तिवीण मुक्ति । बळेंवीण शक्ति बोलूं नये ॥१॥ कैसेनि दैवत प्रसन्न त्वरित । उगा राहें निवांत शिणसी वायां ॥२॥ सायासें करिसी प्रपञ्च दिननिशीं । हरिसी न भजसी कोण्या गुणे ॥३॥ ज्ञानदेव म्हणे हरिजप करणें । तुटेल धरणें प्रपंचाचें ॥४॥ — "Without feeling there is no devotion; without devotion no release; do not speak of a strength that has no force behind it. How would the god be pleased in a hurry? Just stay still, at ease — you are tiring yourself for nothing. With such labour you work at the world day and night; by what quality is it that you do not turn to Hari? Dnyandev says: say the name of Hari, and the grip of the world will loosen."
The Haripāṭh is twenty-odd short abhangas sung every day on the Wari, and this is the one that speaks to a tired person directly. Ugā rāheṁ nivānt, śiṇasī vāyāṁ — stay quiet, stay at ease, you are wearing yourself out for nothing. He is not scolding; he is describing a person he can see, and the first thing he says to them is sit down. Text after sanskritdocuments.org, which prints प्रपञ्च and कोण्या गुणे; the Haripāṭh circulates in several recensions, and numbering and spelling vary.
निद्रेचिया वाटा नवचे । ऐसा दृढिवेचेनि अवतरणें नाचे । तें शरीरचि नव्हे तयाचें । मा योगु कवणाचा ॥३४७॥ म्हणौनि अतिशयें विषयो सेवावा । तैसा विरोधु नोहावा । कां सर्वथा निरोधावा । हेंही नको ॥३४८॥ … बाहेर युक्तीची मुद्रा पडे । तव आंत आंत सुख वाढे । तेथें सहजेंचि योगु घडे । नाभ्यासितां ॥३५३॥ — "One who will not go the way of sleep, who struts about on the strength of his own hardness — that body is not even his own; whose yoga could it be? So: do not indulge the senses to excess; but do not make war on them either; and do not suppress them altogether — not that either… When the mark of good measure shows on the outside, inside, slowly, the ease grows. There yoga happens by itself — without practising."
Three moves. First, the man who refuses to sleep and parades his toughness — his body, Dnyaneshwar says, is not his; he has forfeited it. Second, the refusal of all three strategies the tired person usually has: indulge, fight, suppress — not that, not that, and not that either. And third, the line to keep: sahajeṁchi yogu ghaḍe, nābhyāsitāṁ — yoga happens of itself, without the practising. The thing you have been straining for is described here as the thing that arrives when the straining stops.
किंबहुना सर्वसुखीं । पूर्ण होऊनि तिहीं लोकीं । भजिजो आदिपुरुखीं । अखंडित ॥ — "In short: may all, in the three worlds, become full of every happiness — complete — and serve the Primal Being, unbroken."
The eighth of the nine ovīs of his closing prayer, and the one that sums the others up — kiṁbahunā, "what more is there to say". The word to notice is pūrṇa, full, complete. Not successful, not accomplished, not having got there: full. For a reader running on empty, the closing prayer of his nine-thousand-ovī book asks, for everyone, exactly the opposite condition — and it was written by someone who had reason to be exhausted at fifteen. We have taken it from the text itself; the file at sanskritdocuments.org that prints the Pasāyadān on its own numbers this ovī 1799, counting from a different starting line.
Who is talking, and to whom, is the thing to hold. A boy who has been refused the thread ceremony, whose parents, the tradition says, gave up their lives at Prayag so the children might be accepted, who has every reason to be driven — and who, when he reaches the Gita's two verses on measure, does not use them to tell his listeners to be disciplined. He uses them to tell farmers to honour their sleep. Nidrehī mānu dīje. The Sanskrit says measure; the Marathi says respect. It is the gentlest possible reading of a passage about discipline, and he chose it.
And he says the thing most of us have never been told about rest: that it is where the yoga actually happens. Sahajeṁchi yogu ghaḍe, nābhyāsitāṁ — of itself, without practising. The person who sleeps at sleep's hour and wakes at waking's, who speaks in measure and walks in measure, does not then also have to do yoga on top. The measure is the yoga. For someone whose exhaustion comes partly from adding things — one more practice, one more fix, one more good habit on a day already too full — this is a thirteenth-century voice saying that the addition was the problem, and that what you are chasing is what comes when you stop adding.
Measured words. Measured steps. And give sleep its honour.
A boy of fifteen said it to farmers, and the Marathi has kept it for seven hundred years.
Will the gale stop because you said so?
Arjuna complains that the mind is like the wind. The Sanskrit gives him one verse; Dnyaneshwar lets him keep talking for seven, in the language people actually panic in — and then has the teacher answer with one word.
अर्जुन म्हणे देवा । तुम्ही सांगा कीर आमुचिया कणवा । परी न पुरों जी स्वभावा । मनाचिया ॥४११॥
हें मन कैसें केवढें । ऐसें पाहों म्हणों तरी न सांपडें । एऱ्हवी राहाटावया थोडें । त्रैलोक्य यया ॥४१२॥
म्हणोनि ऐसें कैसें घडेल । जे मर्कट समाधी येईल । कां राहा म्हणितलिया राहेल । महावातु ॥४१३॥
जें बुध्दीतें सळी । निश्चयाते टाळी । धैर्येसी हातफळी । मिळऊनि जाय ॥४१४॥
जें विवेकातें भुलवी । संतोषासी चाड लावी । बैसिजे तरी हिंडवी । दाही दिशा ॥४१५॥
जें निरोधलें घे उवावो । जया संयमुचि होय सावावो । तें मन आपुला स्वभावो । सांडील काई ॥४१६॥
तंव कृष्ण म्हणती साचचि । बोलत आहासि तें तैसेंचि । यया मनाचा कीर चपळचि । स्वभावो गा ॥४१८॥
mhaṇoni aiseṁ kaiseṁ ghaḍel, je markaṭ samādhī yeīl, kāṁ rāhā mhaṇitaliyā rāhel, mahāvātu
jeṁ vivekāteṁ bhulavī, santoṣāsī chāḍ lāvī, baisije tarī hiṁḍavī, dāhī diśā
taṁva kṛṣṇa mhaṇatī sāchachi, bolat āhāsi teṁ taiseṁchi, yayā manāchā kīr chapaḷachi, svabhāvo gā
"Arjuna said: Lord, you tell me this out of kindness, but I cannot keep up with the mind's nature. What is this mind, how big is it? I try to look and cannot find it — and yet the three worlds are too small for it to roam in. So how could this ever happen — that a monkey should sit down in samādhi? Will a gale stop because you told it to stay? It needles the intellect, dodges resolve, slips out of the grip of patience. It fools discernment, makes contentment want more; sit down, and it marches you through the ten directions. Restrain it and it swells; the restraint itself becomes its ally. Will such a mind abandon its own nature? — Then Krishna said: true. What you are saying is exactly so; this mind's nature is indeed restless."
The Dnyāneshwarī (Bhāvārthadīpikā, 1290) is a fixed text with settled ovī numbering — unlike the abhang corpus attributed to him, which is a looser body carried by Warkari singing. The numbers above follow the mr.wikisource text; the standard printed editions (Sākhare, Dāṇḍekar) agree to within an ovī or two in this chapter, and we have not yet checked against a named critical edition. Ovī 417, which repeats the complaint, is omitted between 416 and 418 to keep the exchange readable; nothing in it changes the sense.
The line to notice is 418, the first word of Krishna's reply: sāchachi — true, just so. Dnyaneshwar has taken the Sanskrit asaṁśayam of Gītā 6.35 and made it a Marathi teacher saying yes, you're right to a boy who has just said his mind is a monkey. A few ovīs on, at 428, Arjuna gives up and calls the mind anāvar — unholdable.
ऐसे अनन्यगतिकें चित्तें । चिंतितसांते मातें । जे उपासिती तयांतें । मीचि सेवीं ॥ ते एकवटूनि जिये क्षणीं । अनुसरले गा माझिये वाहणी । तेव्हांचि तयांची चिंतवणी । मजचि पडली ॥ मग तीहीं जें जें करावे । तें मजचि पडिलें आघवें । जैशी अजातपक्षांचेनि जीवें । पक्षिणी जिये ॥ आपुली तहानभूक नेणे । तान्हया निकें तें माउलीसीचि करणें ॥ — "Those who, with a mind that has nowhere else to go, think of me and serve me — I serve them. The moment they gathered themselves and came into my keeping, their worrying fell to me. Then whatever they had to do fell to me, all of it — the way a mother bird lives for her unfledged chicks, forgetting her own hunger and thirst; what is good for the infant is the mother's to do."
Cintavaṇī — worrying, the thing you are doing — and majachi paḍalī, fell to me. Where the Sanskrit says I carry, the Marathi says the worry itself changed hands. And then the image that is not in the Gita at all: a mother bird with chicks too young to fly, who forgets her own hunger — written, if the tradition's story is right, by a teenager with no parents. Whatever you make of the theology, it is some of the most tender Marathi anyone has written about who is supposed to be carrying the worry, and the answer is not you.
परि वैराग्यचेनि आधारें । जरि लाविलें अभ्यासाचिये मोहरें । तरि केतुलेनि एके अवसरें । स्थिरावेल ॥ — "But if, leaning on detachment, it is turned towards practice — then, at some one moment, it will settle."
The tense is the thing. Not it settles, not it will settle tonight — ketulenī eke avasareṁ, at some one occasion, unspecified. Dnyaneshwar keeps the Gita's refusal to give a date, inside a sentence that is otherwise a promise. For someone who has been told the breathing exercise should have worked by now, this is the honest version: the teacher who agreed your mind is a gale also says the settling comes, and does not say when, and does not pretend the not-saying is small.
जरी येतुलेनि चित्त स्थिरावें । तरी काजा आलें स्वभावें । नाही तरी घालावें । मोकलुनी ॥ मग मोकलिलें जेथ जाईल । तेथूनि नियमूचि घेऊनि येईल । ऐसेनि स्थैर्याची होईल । सवे ययां ॥ — "If by this much the mind steadies — good, the work is done of itself. If not, let it loose. Then wherever the loosed mind goes, from there the restraint itself will bring it back; and in this way it will get the habit of steadiness."
Mokalunī — let it go, slacken the rope. A thirteenth-century teacher telling the student to release the mind so that bringing it back can be practised — the exact opposite of the instruction most anxious people have internalised, which is that a mind must be gripped. In his reading the walk back is the whole exercise, and a walk back cannot be practised without first letting it leave. If your mind left this page three times in the last minute, you have the raw material.
What Dnyaneshwar does with Gītā 6.34 is the thing to notice before any of his verses. The Sanskrit gives Arjuna one śloka to complain in. The Marathi gives him seven, and they are a catalogue of what a racing mind actually does, written by someone who had clearly watched his own: it needles the intellect, dodges resolve, slips the grip of patience, marches you through the ten directions the moment you sit down, and — the line every anxious person knows — swells when you try to restrain it, so that the restraint becomes its accomplice. Then the monkey. Then the gale. And then, in the first word of the reply, sāchachi. True.
That word is the whole teaching, and it is the one thing nobody says to an anxious person. Not you are overthinking, not just breathe, not it is all in your head. True. Your mind is a gale and it will not stop because you told it to; you are right. A boy who had been boycotted since birth, with every reason for a racing mind, put that agreement into the mouth of God in the language of farmers — and only then, having agreed, taught the slackened rope and the walk back. The practice does not begin with the mind being wrong about itself. It begins with the mind being heard.
Will the gale stop because you told it to? he asked.
No, said the teacher. True. And then he taught the return.
Enough of this now
The Gita gives Arjuna two verses to beg the universe to stop. Dnyaneshwar, at about fifteen, gives the moment forty ovīs — and one of them is the sentence every overwhelmed person has said under their breath.
यालागीं जी देवा । एथिंचें भय उपजतसे जीवा ।
म्हणौनि येतुला लळा पाळावा । जे पुरे हें आतां ॥५९३॥
पैं चराचर विनोदें पाहिजे । मग तेणें सुखें घरीं राहिजे ।
तैसें चतुर्भुज रूप तुझें । तो विसांवा आम्हां ॥५९४॥
mhaṇauni yetulā laḷā pāḷāvā, je pure heṁ ātāṁ
paiṁ carācar vinodeṁ pāhije, mag teṇeṁ sukheṁ gharīṁ rāhije
taiseṁ caturbhuj rūp tujheṁ, to visāṁvā āmhāṁ
"So, God — fear is rising in me here. Indulge me this one wish: enough of this now. One goes out and looks at the whole moving world for amusement, and then, content, comes home and stays there. Your four-armed form is that to us — it is our resting place."
Dnyāneshwarī (Bhāvārthadīpikā) chapter 11, ovīs 593–594 in the mr.wikisource text, which follows the common Sākhare-line numbering; some printings differ by one or two. Unlike the abhang corpus, the Dnyāneshwarī is a fixed text with settled wording — the variants here are spellings only (येतुला / एतुला). Laḷā pāḷaṇeṁ is what a parent does for a child's whim; visāṁvā is rest, the place one stops. Not yet checked against a named critical edition.
Ovīs 590–592, just before, give the reason. Arjuna wants to talk to Krishna, to be near him, to embrace him — and asks which of a thousand mouths he is supposed to chat with, whom among the uncountable he is supposed to hug. "You cannot run alongside the wind; you cannot embrace the sky." The infinite, Dnyaneshwar notices, is not something you can have a conversation with. That is what is wrong with it.
जीव विसंवावयाचिया चाडा । सैंघ धांवाधांवी करितसे बापुडा । परि सोयही कवणेंकडां । न लभे एथ ॥३७३॥ ऐसें विश्वरूपाचिया महामारी । जीवित्व गेलें आहें चराचरीं । जी न बोलें तरि काय करीं । कैसेनि राहें ? ॥३७४॥ — "Wanting somewhere to rest, the poor soul runs this way and that — and finds no opening anywhere. In this great plague of the cosmic form, life itself has gone out of everything that moves and does not move. If I do not speak, what else can I do? How am I supposed to stay?"
The exact anatomy of ghutan, in thirteenth-century Marathi. Soy — a way, a route, an opening — and kavaṇeṁkaḍāṁ na labhe, not to be found in any direction. Then the question nobody asks on your behalf: kaiseni rāheṁ? — how do I stay? Not how do I escape. How do I remain in this. Dnyaneshwar, who was a child, understood that the second question is the one the overwhelmed person is actually asking.
जरी तूं गोसावी आमुचा अनंता । तरी सुईं वोडण माझिया जीविता । सांटवीं पसारा हा मागुता । महामारीचा ॥३८३॥ … म्हणौनि वेगीं प्रसन्न होईं देवराया । संहरीं संहरीं आपुली माया । काढीं मातें महाभया- । पासोनियां ॥३८५॥ — "If you are our master, Ananta, then put a shield over my life. Fold this spread-out expanse back in — this plague. … So quickly, king of gods, be kind. Withdraw, withdraw your māyā. Pull me out of this great fear."
Sāṁṭavīṁ pasārā — fold the spread back; the verb is for gathering up something laid out, a cloth, a shop's wares at closing. And then the doubled imperative, saṁharīṁ saṁharīṁ, withdraw, withdraw — the way a person says bas, bas. The boy translator has heard what the Sanskrit prasīda sounds like when a frightened person actually says it.
देवा विश्वरूप पहावयाचे डोहळे । केले तिये पावलों प्रतिफळें । बापा देखिलासि आतां डोळे । निवावे तैसे निवाले ॥३६६॥ — "God, I had a craving to see the cosmic form — and I have received its fruit. Father, I have seen it; now my eyes are as cooled as they are ever going to be."
Ḍohāḷe is the Marathi word for a pregnant woman's cravings — Arjuna craved to see everything, and Dnyaneshwar lets the irony sit: he asked for this. Then nivāve taise nivāle, cooled as much as they will cool — the dry Marathi of a man saying I have had enough. Having wanted the whole picture — the whole truth about the job, the family, the future — does not oblige you to keep looking at it.
Dnyaneshwar takes the one place in the Gita where a man asks God to be smaller and makes it the emotional centre of the chapter. Forty ovīs on Arjuna's panic — the soul running in every direction and finding no opening, the shield, the fold-it-back, saṁharīṁ saṁharīṁ — and then the two that are the anchor: enough of this now, and, about the ordinary form, that is our rest. It is extraordinary that a boy of about fifteen wrote it. It is more extraordinary what he chose to dwell on. Not the vision. The limit.
And the reason he gives for wanting the small form back is not fear alone, but I want to talk to you, and which of a thousand mouths do I talk to? The infinite cannot be addressed. It cannot be hugged. Nobody can have a conversation with everything at once, and the mind that is trying to — the eighty-tab mind, the all-of-it-at-once mind — is trying to embrace the sky. Dnyaneshwar's answer to too-much is not transcendence. It is the ordinary face, the one you can have a conversation with, the one he calls visāṁvā: the place where you stop walking and sit.
The soul runs in every direction and finds no opening.
Enough of this now, the boy wrote. The small form is where we rest.
He did not even notice it fall from his hand
He did not translate the Gita; he slowed it down. Where the Sanskrit gives Arjuna's collapse two verses, the Dnyāneshwarī gives it a page — and in the middle of that page is the most exact line about numbness in the language.
येणें नांवेंचिं नेणों कायी । मज आपणपें सर्वथा नाहीं । मन बुद्धी ठायीं । स्थिर नोहे ॥१९५॥
देखें देह कांपत । तोंड असे कोरडें होत । विकळता उपजत । गात्रांसी ॥१९६॥
सर्वांगा कांटाळा आला । अति संतापु उपनला । तेथ बेंबळे हातु गेला । गांडीवाचा ॥१९७॥
तें न धरताचि निष्टलें । परि नेणेंचि हातोनि पडिले । ऐसे हृदय असे व्यापिलें । मोहें येणें ॥१९८॥
dekheṁ deh kāṁpat, toṇḍ ase koraḍeṁ hot, vikaḷatā upajat, gātrāṁsī
sarvāṁgā kāṁṭāḷā ālā, ati santāpu upanalā, teth bembaḷe hātu gelā, gāṁḍīvāchā
teṁ na dharatāchi niṣṭaleṁ, pari neṇeṁchi hātoni paḍile, aise hṛday ase vyāpileṁ, moheṁ yeṇeṁ
"I don't know what to call this. I am not myself at all; mind and intellect will not stay in place. See — the body trembles, the mouth is going dry, a weakness is rising in the limbs. Every part of me is revolted; a great burning has come up; and there the hand on the Gāṇḍīva went slack. Unheld, it slipped — but I did not even notice it fall from my hand. So completely has this bewilderment taken the heart."
The same honest distinction: the Dnyāneshwarī — finished in 1290 by the text's own colophon — is a fixed, settled work with stable chapter-and-ovī numbering, unlike the looser abhang corpus carried by Warkari singing. These four ovīs are 1.195–198 in both the mr.wikisource text and the sanskritdocuments.org edition, which agree on the numbering throughout chapters 1 and 2. Spelling variants between the two are small (बेंबळे / बेंबळ, गांडीवाचा / गांडिवाचा, गात्रांसी / गात्रांसीही). Not yet checked against a named critical edition (Sākhare / the Government of Maharashtra edition).
What he adds to the Sanskrit: Gita 1.30 says only gāṇḍīvaṁ sraṁsate hastāt, "the bow slips from my hand." Dnyaneshwar supplies the clause the Gita leaves out — pari neṇeṁchi hātoni paḍile, "and I didn't even know it had fallen." That is not translation. That is a fifteen-year-old reporting something he knew from inside: the gap between an event and the registering of it.
जैसें लवण जळें झळंबलें । ना तरी अभ्र वातें हाले । तैसे सधीर परी विरमलें । हृदय तयाचें ॥३॥ म्हणोनि कृपा आकळिला । दिसतसे अति कोमाइला । जैसा कर्दमीं रुपला । राजहंस ॥४॥ — "As salt dissolves in water, or a cloud is shaken apart by wind — so his heart, steady as it was, went slack and stopped. Seized by pity, he looks utterly wilted — like a royal swan stuck in mud."
Two words. Viramaleṁ — ceased, went still, stopped running, the verb for a machine that has wound down. And komāilā — wilted, the way a flower goes when the water has stopped reaching it. Dnyaneshwar does not describe Arjuna as grieving or afraid at the start of chapter two; he describes him as having stopped — a steady heart gone slack, a swan that is not drowning but cannot move. If you have been looking for a Marathi word for what you are in, viramaleṁ is it.
आइकें सखेदु बोले श्रीकृष्णातें । आतां नाळवावें तुम्हीं मातें । मी सर्वथा न झुंजें येथें । भरंवसेनि ॥८२॥ ऐसें येकि हेळां बोलिला । मग मौन धरोनि ठेला । तेथ श्रीकृष्णा विस्मो पातला । देखोनि तयाते ॥८३॥ — "Listen — grieving, he said to Krishna: don't coax me now. I will not fight here. That is certain. He said it once, like that — and then he held his silence and stayed so. And Krishna, seeing him, was filled with wonder."
The Sanskrit says tūṣṇīṁ babhūva, "he became silent." Dnyaneshwar gives the silence a posture — mauna dharoni ṭhelā, he took hold of silence and stayed in it — and then reports Krishna's reaction, which the Gita itself does not: vismo, wonder. Not disappointment, not alarm. The one person watching the collapsed man looks at the silence and finds it astonishing, the way one might look at sudden weather. Nobody in the text treats it as a thing to be snapped out of.
ना तरी असाध्य देखोनि व्याधी । अमृतासम दिव्य औषधी । वैद्य सूचि निरवधि । निदानींची ॥८६॥ … मग सरोष बोलों आदरिले । जैसें मातेच्या कोपीं थोकलें । स्नेह आथी ॥८८॥ … तैसे वरिवरि पाहतां उदासें । आंत तरी अतिसुरसें । तियें वाक्यें हृषीकेशें । बोलों आदरिलीं ॥९०॥ — "Or like a physician who, seeing a disease past ordinary cure, thinks out the one divine, nectar-like remedy for its root … Then he began to speak sharply — the way love is held inside a mother's anger … Words dry and indifferent on the surface; inside, full of sweetness. Such were the words Hṛṣīkeśa began to speak."
Where the Sanskrit has a smile (prahasann iva), Dnyaneshwar — honestly — does not. He gives three pictures instead of what Krishna is doing when he finally speaks to the silent man: a physician before a hard case, thinking rather than reassuring; a mother whose sharpness has love packed inside it; medicine bitter on the tongue and nectar underneath. Not one of the three is "cheer up". If someone in your life has sounded impatient with your flatness lately, this is the most generous reading of them available.
In the tradition's telling, Dnyaneshwar grew up inside a silence — a family the village had agreed not to speak to, children who learned early that a room can be full and give nothing back. So when he reached the two verses where a hero's body switches off, he did not hurry past them. He made them longer. He gave the trembling its own ovī, the dry mouth its own, the slackening hand its own — and then added a clause the Gita itself does not have: I didn't even notice it fall. The bow was on the ground before the man knew his hand was empty. That gap — between the thing happening and the feeling of it arriving — is where every reader of this section is living tonight. A thirteenth-century teenager named it in six words.
And when the man goes silent, Dnyaneshwar does something with the one who is watching. He does not have Krishna reach for the feeling. He has him think — the way a physician thinks before a case that will not respond to the ordinary remedy — and when he finally speaks, the words come out dry on the surface and full underneath, like medicine, like a mother. The silence was never treated as an emergency to be talked over. It was treated as a condition worth a diagnosis. For a reader who has had enough of being told to let it out, that is the kinder response, and it was written seven hundred years ago in your own language.
The bow slipped — and he did not even notice it fall.
The one who saw it did not scold. He thought, like a physician, and then he spoke.
Which of the two is better — we do not know
When he reached Arjuna's confession in the second chapter he did not shorten it. He made it longer and plainer, and gave the confused man an image the Sanskrit does not have: a person whose sight has clouded over, with everything he needs within arm's reach, able to see none of it.
आतां ऐसियांतें वधावें । कीं अव्हेरूनियां निघावें । या दोहींमाजीं बरवें । तें नेणों आम्ही ॥५४॥
आम्हां काय उचित । तें पाहतां न स्फुरे एथ । जें मोहें येणें चित्त । व्याकुळ माझें ॥५५॥
तिमिरावरुद्ध जैसें । दृष्टीचें तेज भ्रंशे । मग पासींच असतां न दिसे । वस्तुजात ॥५६॥
देवा तैसें मज जाहलें । जें मन हें भ्रांती ग्रासिलें । आतां काय हित आपुलें । तेंही नेणें ॥५७॥
āmhāṁ kāy ucit, teṁ pāhatāṁ na sphure eth, jeṁ moheṁ yeṇeṁ citt, vyākuḷ mājheṁ
timirāvaruddha jaiseṁ, dṛṣṭīcheṁ tej bhraṁśe, mag pāsīṁch asatāṁ na dise, vastujāt
devā taiseṁ maj jāhaleṁ, jeṁ man heṁ bhrāṁtī grāsileṁ, ātāṁ kāy hit āpuleṁ, teṁhī neṇeṁ
"Now — kill such people, or turn away and leave? Which of these two is better — we do not know. What is right for us — I look, and nothing comes; this delusion has made my mind distraught. As when a film covers the eye and its light fails — and then even the thing right beside you cannot be seen — so it has happened to me, God: delusion has swallowed my mind, and now I do not know even what is good for me."
The Dnyāneshwarī (1290 CE) is a fixed text with settled ovī numbering, unlike the abhang corpus attributed to Dnyaneshwar; these are ovīs 54–57 of chapter 2, where the two independent online texts we checked (sanskritdocuments.org and mr.wikisource) agree on the numbering. One real variant: the third line of ovī 54 reads या दोहींमाजीं बरवें ("which of these two is better") in one, and या दोहोंमाजी काइ करावे ("of these two, what to do") in the other. Both end तें नेणों आम्ही — we do not know. Spelling variants: ऐसियांतें / ऐसेयांतें, पासींच / पांसीच. Not yet checked against a named critical edition (Sākhare; Government of Maharashtra text).
What is Dnyaneshwar's and not the Gita's: the Sanskrit of 2.6 says we do not know which is better; the Sanskrit of 2.7 says my mind is confused about dharma. The clouded eye — timirāvaruddha, "shut in by timira", the old name for a film or darkening over the eye, its light failing, the object right beside you invisible — is his own. He is explaining the Sanskrit to farmers, and he reaches for the experience every one of them has had of groping for something they know is there.
तैसें सर्वज्ञेंही मियां । सर्वही निर्धारूनियां । निकें होय तें धनंजया । सांगितलें तुज ॥१३३१॥ आतां तूं ययावरी । निकें हें निर्धारीं । निर्धारूनि करीं । आवडे तैसें ॥१३३२॥ — "So I, who know all, have weighed everything and told you what is good, Dhananjaya. Now you, on top of that, weigh for yourself what is good — and having weighed it, do as you please."
His Marathi for yathecchasi tathā kuru. Āvaḍe taiseṁ — as you like, as it pleases you — is the phrase a Marathi mother uses when she has said her piece and is handing you the choice. Dnyaneshwar heard that tone in the Sanskrit and kept it. Near its close (18.63), the God who has spoken for seventeen chapters tells the confused man to weigh it himself — and in the next breath (18.66) asks for surrender. Both are in the text. This line is the weigh it.
यया देवाचिया बोला । अर्जुनु उगाचि ठेला । तेथ देवो म्हणती भला । अवंचकु होसी ॥१३३३॥ वाढतयापुढें भुकेला । उपरोधें म्हणे मी धाला । तैं तोचि पीडे आपुला । आणि दोषुही तया ॥१३३४॥ — "At these words of God, Arjuna simply stayed silent. Then God said: good — but don't cheat yourself. A hungry man who, out of politeness, tells the one serving him 'I am full' — he is the one who suffers, and the fault is his as well."
There is no silence in the Gita at this point; Dnyaneshwar put it there. Handed the decision, Arjuna goes quiet — and Krishna, reading the quiet, tells him: if you are still confused, say so; do not say "I'm full" to be polite. For everyone who has nodded at the end of the family meeting and gone home with the knot intact, this is the permission the Sanskrit forgot to include. Confusion swallowed out of courtesy, he says, hurts the one who swallows it. Asking again is allowed.
आतां मोह असे कीं नाहीं । हें ऐसें जी पुससी काई । कृतकृत्य जाहलों पाहीं । तुझेपणें ॥१५६२॥ गुंतलों होतों अर्जुनगुणें । तो मुक्त जालों तुझेपणें । आतां पुसणें सांगणें । दोन्ही नाहीं ॥१५६३॥ — "Now you ask whether the delusion is still there or not? Look — I am done, through being yours. I was tangled in being Arjuna; I came loose in being yours. Now there is no more asking, and no more telling — neither."
Guṁtaloṁ — tangled. The Marathi verb is the same thread as the Hindi word for this feeling: uljhan is a guṁtā, a snarl. And what he was tangled in was not the decision — it was being Arjuna. The warrior, the brother, the man with a reputation. Dnyaneshwar's reading of the Gita's last turn is that what came loose was not the choice but the identity that had been making the choice impossible. For the one who no longer knows who they are: he describes that loosening as the relief, not the loss.
Dnyaneshwar's confusion was not a mood either; it was a life. A boy the town had decided about before he could speak, whose parents, the tradition says, had given up their lives at Prayag to clear his name, who was writing a commentary on dharma for people the dharma had excluded. When he reaches Arjuna saying I do not know what is right, he does not treat it as a weakness to hurry past on the way to the philosophy. He slows down. He gives it four ovīs where the Sanskrit gives it one, and lets the saint say teṁ neṇoṁ āmhī — we don't know — in the plain speech of a Maharashtrian village, where the phrase is said a hundred times a day about rain and prices and whether the guest is coming.
And then the image, which is the thing to keep. A clouded eye in a familiar room. Nothing taken away — the furniture is all there, pāsīṁch asatāṁ, right beside you. A film has come over the eye and its light has failed, and the familiar room has become a place you grope through. This is a kinder diagnosis than any you have given yourself this week. You have not lost the ability to decide. You have not become stupid, or weak, or disloyal. The seeing has clouded around things you already know, and clouding is a condition that passes, not a verdict on you. He does not say when the light comes back. He says what the clouding is.
He let the saint say we do not know in plain Marathi.
And he had God say: if you are still hungry, don't tell me you are full.
These passages live inside the longer reads, beside eleven other voices —
the full long-read on Fear → · Anger → · Sadness → · Loneliness → · Tiredness → · Anxiety → · Overwhelm → · Numbness → · Confusion →
Three hundred years later, in the same tradition: Tukaram →